<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Semiconductor Manufacturing &#38; Design Community &#187; White Papers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://semimd.com/resource-center/white-papers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://semimd.com</link>
	<description>Deep Insights for Chip Builders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:39:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EUV Flare And Proximity Modeling And Model-Based Correction</title>
		<link>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/05/16/euv-flare-and-proximity-modeling-and-model-based-correction/</link>
		<comments>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/05/16/euv-flare-and-proximity-modeling-and-model-based-correction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 07:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Resource Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14nm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[22nm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mentor Graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semimd.com/?p=8376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EUV will introduce unwanted patterning distortions that must be accurately modeled and corrected.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The introduction of EUV lithography into the semiconductor fabrication process will enable a continuation of Moore’s law below the 22 nm technology node. EUV lithography will, however, introduce new and unwanted sources of patterning distortions which must be accurately modeled and corrected on the reticle. Flare caused by scattered light in the projection optics is expected to result in several nanometers of on-wafer dimensional variation, if left uncorrected. Previous work by the authors has focused on combinations of model-based and rules-based approaches to modeling and correction of flare in EUV lithography. This paper focuses on the development of an all model-based approach to compensation of both flare and proximity effects in EUV lithography. The advantages of such an approach in terms of both model and OPC accuracy will be discussed. In addition, the authors will discuss the benefits and tradeoffs associated with hybrid OPC approaches which mix both rules-based.</p>
<p>To view this white paper, click <a href="http://www.mentor.com/products/ic-manufacturing/resources/overview/euv-flare-and-proximity-modeling-and-model-based-correction-fef81b7f-d8d2-42d9-bb23-f3f6ae47e67a">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/05/16/euv-flare-and-proximity-modeling-and-model-based-correction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mask Data Preparation Flow For Advanced Technology Nodes</title>
		<link>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/04/18/mask-data-preparation-flow-for-advanced-technology-nodes/</link>
		<comments>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/04/18/mask-data-preparation-flow-for-advanced-technology-nodes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 07:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fractured data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mask data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mentor Graphics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semimd.com/?p=8231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to tame data file sizes, address fractured data files creation and streamline data review techniques.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trend to reduce critical features dimension has dramatically increased design file size. Design tape–out flows at the 28 nm technology node handle post-OPC data files that reach hundreds of gigabytes. This trend increases at 20 nm and below. That predicts new challenges in mask data preparation flow for advanced technology nodes. We have developed a mask data preparation flow to tackle the challenge of maintaining a consistent delivery time to mask shops, while efficiently using exiting hardware. Taming data file size required innovations in data processing for fractured data files creation and also in data review techniques. The paper will discuss these innovations and conduct a demonstration with results in a 28 nm technology node production flow. Cost-benefit analysis will be illustrated with runtime comparisons of fractured data creation, and data review between traditional mask data preparation flows and this specific flow.</p>
<p>To view this white paper, click <a href="http://www.mentor.com/products/ic-manufacturing/resources/overview/mask-data-preparation-flow-for-advanced-technology-nodes-eb0b8820-46ea-45f0-85d9-68eae45aec57">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/04/18/mask-data-preparation-flow-for-advanced-technology-nodes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computational Lithography</title>
		<link>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/03/21/computational-lithography-2/</link>
		<comments>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/03/21/computational-lithography-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 07:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Resource Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational lithography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mentor Graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moore's Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semimd.com/?p=8082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enabling 12 technology nodes in 12 years. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Computational lithography has become an integral part of design since the 130 nm process node. New techniques continue to be developed to extend the steady node shrink year after year. </p>
<p>To read this white paper, click <a href="http://www.mentor.com/products/ic-manufacturing/request?selected=60174&amp;null&amp;fmpath=/products/ic-manufacturing/techpubs/requestpubs&amp;id=60174">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/03/21/computational-lithography-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next-Generation Signoff Analysis</title>
		<link>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/03/21/next-generation-signoff-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/03/21/next-generation-signoff-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 07:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Resource Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signoff analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semimd.com/?p=8078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best practices for tackling electrical, physical and manufacturing challenges.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The electronic design industry continues to push the limits of moore&#8217;s law through smaller and smaller process nodes. As we reach 45nm, manufacturing and process control becomes increasingly difficult, making it imperative that manufacturability issues be addressed much earlier in the design cycle to avoid costly respins and chip failures.</p>
<p>Physical and electrical effects at this node challenge both design closure and time to market, and the requirements for design signoff are changing in order to address the inherent manufacturing and process variability. Naturally, this situation can seriously undermine the manufacturability of the design. In fact, a paradigm shift is evident in the all-important signoff analysis step of the digital design cycle. </p>
<p>At issue are the levels of validity and confidence that can be reached with today’s Ic design closure and signoff methodologies. designs that pass traditional sign-off standards might still fail in 45nm silicon. In contrast, using excessive guard-bands or over-conservative margins to satisfy traditional static timing analysis (sTA) signoff regimes can negate the benefits that smaller process geometries offer. </p>
<p>This <a href="http://www.cadence.com/rl/Resources/white_papers/signoff_for_manufacturability_wp.pdf">paper</a> looks at some of the electrical, physical, and manufacturing challenges to current signoff analysis methods, and shows new ways to improve predictability, productivity and performance at the 45nm process node. using these new methodologies, designers can prevent silicon failures and better manage timing, leakage power, and signal integrity–both across a wafer and across the surface of a single chip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/03/21/next-generation-signoff-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Optimizing Test To Enable Diagnosis-Driven Yield Analysis</title>
		<link>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/02/21/optimizing-test-to-enable-diagnosis-driven-yield-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/02/21/optimizing-test-to-enable-diagnosis-driven-yield-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Resource Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATPG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mentor Graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semimd.com/?p=7929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Decreasing time to yield requires planning for what patterns to generate, what data to archive and hot to optimize your test program.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using diagnosis-driven yield analysis, companies have decreased their time to yield, managed manufacturing excursions and recovered yield caused by systematic defects. Dramatic time savings and yield gains have been proven using these methods. Companies must plan ahead to take advantage of diagnosis-driven yield analysis. The planning needs to include how and what patterns to generate during ATPG/DFT, what design data to archive, how to optimize your test program, how much data to collect, and what/how much diagnosis to perform. This white paper will address how to optimize the test environment in order to enable efficient diagnosis-driven yield analysis.</p>
<p>To download this white paper, click <a href="http://www.mentor.com/products/silicon-yield/resources/overview/optimizing-test-to-enable-diagnosis-driven-yield-analysis-e51ca8e5-c81a-46c8-a177-5c5abb78d65b">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/02/21/optimizing-test-to-enable-diagnosis-driven-yield-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calibre RealTime: Placing Signoff Verification into the Custom Designer&#8217;s Hands</title>
		<link>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/01/24/calibre-realtime-placing-signoff-verification-into-the-custom-designers-hands/</link>
		<comments>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/01/24/calibre-realtime-placing-signoff-verification-into-the-custom-designers-hands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Resource Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DFM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mentor Graphics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semimd.com/?p=7765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at how to reduce custom/AMS design cycle time while improving design quality with on-demand, in-design signoff-quality verification.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to reduce custom/AMS design cycle time while improving design quality with on-demand, in-design, signoff-quality verification from Calibre RealTime.</p>
<p>To download this white paper, click <a href="http://www.mentor.com/products/ic_nanometer_design/request?selected=66206&amp;null&amp;fmpath=/products/ic_nanometer_design/techpubs/requestpubs&amp;id=66206">here</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/01/24/calibre-realtime-placing-signoff-verification-into-the-custom-designers-hands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Call To Action: How 20nm Will Change IC Design</title>
		<link>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/02/21/a-call-to-action-how-20nm-will-change-ic-design/</link>
		<comments>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/02/21/a-call-to-action-how-20nm-will-change-ic-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Resource Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20nm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double patterning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[variability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semimd.com/?p=7931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Double patterning marks a turning point in terms of lithography, variability and complexity. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 20nm process node represents a turning point for the electronics industry. While it brings tremendous power, performance and area advantages, it also comes with new challenges in such areas as lithography, variability, and complexity. The good news is that these become manageable challenges with 20nm-aware EDA tools when they are used within end-to-end, integrated design flows based on a “prevent, analyze, and optimize” methodology. </p>
<p>To download this white paper, click <a href="http://www.cadence.com/rl/Resources/white_papers/20nmIC_wp.pdf">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://semimd.com/blog/2013/02/21/a-call-to-action-how-20nm-will-change-ic-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double Patterning From Design Enablement To Verification</title>
		<link>http://semimd.com/blog/2012/12/13/double-patterning-from-design-enablement-to-verification/</link>
		<comments>http://semimd.com/blog/2012/12/13/double-patterning-from-design-enablement-to-verification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Resource Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20nm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double patterning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LELE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mentor Graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semimd.com/?p=7550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at the challenges and various solutions using LELE at 20nm, including place and route effects, OPC and mask misalignment and image rounding.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Litho-etch-litho-etch (LELE) is the double patterning (DP) technology of choice for 20 nm contact, via, and lower metal layers. We discuss the unique design and process characteristics of LELE DP, the challenges they present, and various solutions, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>DP design methodologies, current DP conflict feedback mechanisms, and how they can help designers identify and resolve conflicts.</li>
<li>Effects on place and route (P&amp;R) and new reqirements for physical design.</li>
<li>Why LELE DP cuts and overlaps are critical to optical process correction (OPC).</li>
<li>Mask misalignment and image rounding as new verification considerations.</li>
</ul>
<p>To download this white paper, click <a href="http://www.mentor.com/products/ic-manufacturing/request?selected=73552&amp;null&amp;fmpath=/products/ic-manufacturing/techpubs/requestpubs&amp;id=73552">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://semimd.com/blog/2012/12/13/double-patterning-from-design-enablement-to-verification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reducing IC Cycle Time With Calibre</title>
		<link>http://semimd.com/blog/2012/11/15/reducing-ic-cycle-time-with-calibre/</link>
		<comments>http://semimd.com/blog/2012/11/15/reducing-ic-cycle-time-with-calibre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Resource Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mentor Graphics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semimd.com/?p=7411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting more functionality on the same die area using more and increasingly complex verification rules is getting more difficult. Here are some solutions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technology is both a blessing and a curse. The same shrinking of transistor size that has enabled chip designers to place significantly more functionality on the same die area is also responsible for the significant increases we have seen in the number and complexity of verification rules. It would be nice if we could use this phenomenon to our advantage, as an excuse for why our job of physical verification should take longer and why we should be given more time than we had for our previous project. As nice as that would be, this is not the case. Increasing competitive environments and the always present compulsion to get products out to market in a timely manner have not permitted such luxuries. Fortunately, despite conspiring forces to elongate this already difficult task, there is a light at the end of the tunnel (no, not a train coming the other direction), the Calibre suite of verification tools, specifically Calibre nmDRC, Calibre nmLVS and Calibre Incremental DRC.</p>
<p>To download this white paper, click <a href="http://www.mentor.com/products/ic_nanometer_design/request?selected=41442&amp;null&amp;fmpath=/products/ic_nanometer_design/techpubs/requestpubs&amp;id=41442">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://semimd.com/blog/2012/11/15/reducing-ic-cycle-time-with-calibre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EUV OPC For 56nm Metal Pitch</title>
		<link>http://semimd.com/blog/2012/10/18/euv-opc-for-56nm-metal-pitch/</link>
		<comments>http://semimd.com/blog/2012/10/18/euv-opc-for-56nm-metal-pitch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Resource Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[15nm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mentor Graphics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semimd.com/?p=7217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At 15nm and beyond, printing of pitches of 64nm and below will be required, and for EUV to replace ArF multi-exposure approaches patterns will have to be printed in a single-exposure process.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the logic generations of the 15 nm node and beyond, the printing of pitches at 64nm and below are needed. For EUV lithography to replace ArF-based multi-exposure techniques, it is required to print these patterns in a single exposure process. The k1 factor is roughly 0.6 for 64nm pitch at an NA of 0.25, and k1  0.52 for 56nm pitch. These k1 numbers are of the same order at which model based OPC was introduced in KrF and ArF lithography a decade or so earlier. While we have done earlier work that used model-based OPC for the 22nm node test devices using EUV,1 we used a simple threshold model without further resist model calibration. For 64 nm pitch at an NA of 0.25, the OPC becomes more important, and at 56nm pitch it becomes critical. For 15 nm node lithography, we resort to a full resist model calibration using tools that were adapted from conventional optical lithography. We use a straight shrink 22 nm test layout to assess post-OPC printability.</p>
<p>To read more, click <a href="http://www.mentor.com/products/ic-manufacturing/request?selected=73547&amp;null&amp;fmpath=/products/ic-manufacturing/techpubs/requestpubs&amp;id=73547">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://semimd.com/blog/2012/10/18/euv-opc-for-56nm-metal-pitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
